Why Prompt Engineering May Be Obsolete — And What Comes Next

Patrick McFadden • May 28, 2025

For years, prompt engineering has been framed as the gateway to effective AI. Tools like ChatGPT seemed to demand it: you had to learn the syntax, the tricks, the hacks — or risk getting generic, shallow output. Entire teams have spun up training sessions, workshops, and job titles around mastering the prompt.



But what if we’ve been solving the wrong problem?


The Insight: 62% of Teams Don’t Train on Prompting


According to the 2025 State of Marketing AI Report, a staggering 62% of organizations don’t train their teams on prompt engineering. It’s not that they don’t care — it’s that most people either:


  • Don’t have time to master prompt syntax
  • Find it inconsistent and unreliable
  • Or never learned how to turn fuzzy thinking into structured input


And that’s the key.


The Real Problem Isn’t Prompting. It’s Thinking.


At Thinking OS™, we’ve flipped the paradigm. Instead of training humans to prompt better, we built a judgment layer that thinks better — upstream of the AI.


Our approach doesn’t require prompt engineering training. Instead, it:

  • Accepts vague or overloaded human input
  • Applies a structured decision framework to extract clarity
  • Simulates tradeoffs, priorities, and constraints
  • Then routes a clean decision path into downstream agents or models


The result? Promptless AI performance.

Not because we skipped prompting — but because we replaced it with upstream thinking.


Why This Matters Now


In a world where:

  • Teams are overloaded
  • AI tools are multiplying
  • Judgment is the scarce layer


… systems that depend on perfectly worded prompts will break. Systems that tolerate — and refine — messy input will scale.


What Thinking OS™ Makes Possible



  • Structured decision-making without prompt fluency
  • Enterprise-grade output, regardless of AI literacy
  • Faster onboarding, fewer errors, better focus


This isn’t theoretical. It’s already deployed in environments where operators can’t afford to wait for prompt training. They just need to know: “What should we do next?”


And Thinking OS answers that — clearly, consistently, and contextually.


Want to see it live? Ask for a simulation of how Thinking OS makes prompting… irrelevant.



This is where AI stops being a tool you talk to — and starts becoming a layer you think through.

By Patrick McFadden June 6, 2025
Thinking OS™ — the world’s first sealed cognition infrastructure
By Patrick McFadden June 1, 2025
How Thinking OS™ Would Triage a Climate-Fueled, Regulation-Blocked, Capital-Withdrawn Ecosystem
By Patrick McFadden May 31, 2025
Translation: It’s not a productivity tool. It’s a cognition system that installs reasoning — not just workflows — into how teams make decisions.
By Patrick McFadden May 24, 2025
The Pattern Everyone’s Missing There’s a new wave sweeping LinkedIn, labs, and leadership rooms: Prompt Engineering is the new literacy. Post after post celebrates how to “talk” to large language models (LLMs) more clearly — and faster. And most of them look like this: “Use Chain-of-Thought” “Add System Instructions” “Prompt Like a Lawyer” “Show 3 Examples” These tips aren’t wrong. They make language models cleaner, tighter, and more usable.  But they all share one critical flaw: They assume your problem is output.
By Patrick McFadden May 24, 2025
Not all “judgment layers” are created equal.  Here’s how to tell what’s real — before the imitation wave crashes.
By Patrick McFadden May 23, 2025
Why generative AI is powerful — but not enough. And why the future belongs to governed judgment.
By Patrick McFadden May 22, 2025
Cognition is no longer just human. And it’s no longer just generative. We’ve entered a new era — one where strategic thinking itself can be modular, transferable, and protected. That shift demands a new concept: Licensed Cognition .
By Patrick McFadden May 21, 2025
In a world of cloned prompts, open models, and copycat software — Thinking OS™ built the one thing you can’t rip off: protected judgment.
By Patrick McFadden May 20, 2025
Founders don’t burn out because they work too hard. They burn out because they carry all the clarity. Every decision. Every tradeoff. Every prioritization. It all comes back to them.  Not because the team isn’t smart. But because the team doesn’t think like they do. And no one taught them how.
By Patrick McFadden May 20, 2025
Most teams don’t fail because of speed, talent, or tools. They fail because the thinking doesn’t scale. In scaling environments, execution systems multiply. CRMs. Notion docs. Dashboards. Daily standups. OKRs. But the deeper you look, the clearer the truth becomes: The decisions that matter still bottleneck around one person. Usually the founder. Sometimes the ops lead. Rarely the team. This isn’t a workflow issue. It’s a judgment issue. And it gets worse as you grow.
More Posts